In concomitanza con il lancio di Windows 8, Futuremark ha lanciato il nuovo 3DMark, chiamato appunto 3DMark, senza alcun numero riconoscitivo, a segnare la forte integrazione che ha con qualsiasi sistema, da Android a Windows a iOS a OSX, dando per la prima volta la possibilità di paragonare le prestazioni su smartphone e PC fisso in maniera schematizzata e professionale. Il benchmark dispone di svariati test, di cui utilizziamo i più intensivi per mettere alla prova le schede video.
Tra questi, il più impegnativo è il Fire Strike, che spinge la tessellazione a livelli davvero elevati, e che “vanta” due versioni ancora più spinte: Extreme (con scene pre-renderizzate a 2560×1440) ed Ultra (scene pre-renderizzate a 3840×2160, ovvero 4K).
| 3DMark Fire Strike – ASRock RX 580 Phantom Gaming X 8G OC 1080p | |
|---|---|
| Punti | |
| EVGA GTX 1080Ti FTW3 (1683/2750) | 24.177 |
| Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X (1055/1500) CFX | 19.890 |
| NVIDIA GTX 1080 FE (1607/2500) | 18.947 |
| Sapphire RX Vega 56 Nitro+ (1305/800) | 18.599 |
| Sapphire RX 470 Nitro+ 8GB (1260/2000) CFX | 18.207 |
| Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro (1050/1000) | 13.624 |
| Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X (1040/1000) | 13.484 |
| Sapphire R9 380 Nitro 4GB (1010/1450) CFX | 13.023 |
| ASRock RX 580 Phantom Gaming X (1380/2000) | 12.883 |
| ASUS GTX 980 Strix OC (1178/1753) | 12.416 |
| Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB OC (1411/2000) | 12.354 |
| NVIDIA GTX 980 (1127/1753) | 11.991 |
| Sapphire RX 480 Nitro+ OC 8GB (1342/2000) | 11.871 |
| Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X (1055/1500) | 11.721 |
| ASUS R9 390 Strix DirectCU III (1070/1500) | 11.492 |
| Sapphire R9 390 Nitro (1010/1500) | 10.953 |
| AMD RX 480 8GB Reference (1266/2000) | 10.840 |
| Sapphire RX 470 Nitro+ OC 8GB (1260/2000) | 10.542 |
| MSI GTX 970 Gaming (1140/1753) | 10.540 |
| Sapphire RX 570 Pulse ITX 4GB (1244/1750) | 10.448 |
| Sapphire R9 380X Nitro (1040/1500) | 8.596 |
| Sapphire R9 380 Nitro 4GB (985/1450) | 7.801 |
| MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G (1241/1753) | 6.952 |
| Sapphire RX 560 Pulse 4GB (1300/1750) | 5.803 |
| Sapphire RX 460 Nitro+ OC 4GB (1250/1750) | 5.408 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike – ASRock RX 580 Phantom Gaming X 8G OC 1440p | |
|---|---|
| Punti | |
| EVGA GTX 1080Ti FTW3 (1683/2750) | 13.827 |
| Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X (1055/1500) CFX | 9.941 |
| NVIDIA GTX 1080 FE (1607/2500) | 9.706 |
| Sapphire RX Vega 56 Nitro+ (1305/800) | 9.573 |
| Sapphire RX 470 Nitro+ 8GB (1260/2000) CFX | 9.455 |
| Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro (1050/1000) | 7.029 |
| Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X (1040/1000) | 7.003 |
| Sapphire R9 380 Nitro 4GB (1010/1450) CFX | 6.749 |
| ASRock RX 580 Phantom Gaming X (1380/2000) | 6.361 |
| ASUS GTX 980 Strix OC (1178/1753) | 6.188 |
| Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB OC (1411/2000) | 6.076 |
| NVIDIA GTX 980 (1127/1753) | 5.846 |
| Sapphire RX 480 Nitro+ OC 8GB (1342/2000) | 5.821 |
| Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X (1055/1500) | 5.709 |
| ASUS R9 390 Strix DirectCU III (1070/1500) | 5.530 |
| AMD RX 480 8GB Reference (1266/2000) | 5.325 |
| Sapphire R9 390 Nitro (1010/1500) | 5.321 |
| MSI GTX 970 Gaming (1140/1753) | 5.238 |
| Sapphire RX 470 Nitro+ OC 8GB (1260/2000) | 5.136 |
| Sapphire RX 570 Pulse ITX 4GB (1244/1750) | 5.129 |
| Sapphire R9 380X Nitro (1040/1500) | 4.216 |
| Sapphire R9 380 Nitro 4GB (985/1450) | 3.836 |
| MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G (1241/1753) | 3.510 |
| Sapphire RX 460 Nitro+ OC 4GB (1250/1750) | 2.599 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike – ASRock RX 580 Phantom Gaming X 8G OC 2160p | |
|---|---|
| Punti | |
| EVGA GTX 1080Ti FTW3 (1683/2750) | 7.242 |
| Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X (1055/1500) CFX | 5.441 |
| NVIDIA GTX 1080 FE (1607/2500) | 5.170 |
| Sapphire RX Vega 56 Nitro+ (1305/800) | 5.148 |
| Sapphire RX 470 Nitro+ 8GB (1260/2000) CFX | 5.103 |
| Sapphire R9 380 Nitro 4GB (1010/1450) CFX | 3.856 |
| Sapphire R9 Fury Tri-X (1040/1000) | 3.796 |
| Sapphire R9 Fury Nitro (1050/1000) | 3.792 |
| ASRock RX 580 Phantom Gaming X (1380/2000) | 3.342 |
| Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB OC (1411/2000) | 3.191 |
| ASUS GTX 980 Strix OC (1178/1753) | 3.149 |
| Sapphire RX 480 Nitro+ OC 8GB (1342/2000) | 3.079 |
| Sapphire R9 390X Tri-X (1055/1500) | 3.012 |
| NVIDIA GTX 980 (1127/1753) | 3.011 |
| ASUS R9 390 Strix DirectCU III (1070/1500) | 2.931 |
| AMD RX 480 8GB Reference (1266/2000) | 2.727 |
| Sapphire R9 390 Nitro (1010/1500) | 2.714 |
| Sapphire RX 470 Nitro+ OC 8GB (1260/2000) | 2.672 |
| Sapphire RX 570 Pulse ITX 4GB (1244/1750) | 2.666 |
| MSI GTX 970 Gaming (1140/1753) | 2.595 |
| Sapphire R9 380X Nitro (1040/1500) | 2.247 |
| Sapphire R9 380 Nitro 4GB (985/1450) | 2.025 |
| Sapphire RX 460 Nitro+ OC 4GB (1250/1750) | 1.357 |
| MSI GTX 960 Gaming 2G (1241/1753) | 1.279 |
Recentemente, invece, è stato introdotto il benchmark Time Spy, che testa le prestazioni delle GPU sfruttando le nuove API Microsoft DirectX 12, con scene pre-renderizzate a 2560×1440:
| 3DMark Time Spy – ASRock RX 580 Phantom Gaming X 8G OC | |
|---|---|
| Marks | |
| EVGA GeForce GTX 1080Ti FTW3 (1683/2750) | 10.258 |
| Sapphire Radeon RX 470 Nitro+ OC 8GB (1260/2000) 2CFX | 7.530 |
| Sapphire Radeon RX Vega 56 Nitro+ (1305/800) | 7.206 |
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 8GB Founders Edition (1607/2500) | 7.153 |
| Sapphire Radeon RX 580 Nitro+ 8GB OC (1411/2000) | 4.778 |
| ASRock RX 580 Phantom Gaming X 8G OC (1380/2000) | 4.676 |
| Sapphire Radeon RX 480 Nitro+ OC 8GB (1342/2000) | 4.585 |
| AMD Radeon RX 480 8GB Reference (1266/2000) | 4.266 |
| Sapphire Radeon RX 570 Pulse ITX 4GB (1244/1750) | 4.082 |
| Sapphire Radeon RX 470 Nitro+ OC 8GB (1260/2000) | 4.049 |
| Sapphire Radeon RX 560 Pulse 4GB (1300/1750) | 2.267 |
| Sapphire Radeon RX 460 Nitro OC 4GB (1250/1750) | 1.998 |
Pagina 9 di 24
![[COMPUTEX 2026] be quiet! svela tanti nuovi prodotti al Computex](https://www.rehwolution.it/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/bq-computex2026-pure-base-803-4x5-5-350x250.jpg)
![[COMPUTEX 2026] Noctua e Carbice insieme per il raffreddamento DIY](https://www.rehwolution.it/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/noctua_nt_cp1_am5_4_announcement_post_v4-scaled-350x250.jpg)
Discussione su post